Laparoscopic Power Morcellation lawsuit | Cancer diagnosis
Laparoscopic power morcellators are a surgical medical device. “Laparoscopic power morcellators are Class II medical devices used during laparoscopic (minimally invasive) surgeries to cut tissue into smaller pieces so the tissue can be removed through a small incision site (typically 2 cm long or less).” FDA Enduring gynecological surgery is a horrific, painful experience. Learning that the surgical procedure utilized at the hospital could have caused a devastating diagnosis of uterine cancer is devastating. In 2017, the Federal Drug Administration issued a revised assessment indicating and discouraging that laparoscopic power morcellation (LPM) be used in hysterectomy and myomectomy surgical procedures. The FDA was concerned that LPM could cause a greater chance of spreading uterine tissue that could hold cancer. Many victims are now wondering whether there will be power morcellator lawsuit settlements.
How a Morcellator Works
Laparoscopic power morcellators are used during surgical procedures. Their purpose is to take large masses of tissue and make them smaller. The surgeon makes a small incision and can remove the tissue through the incision site. The laparoscopic power morcellator works by using sharp edges to finely cut the tissue. It can be inserted through small incision and reaches the site of the tissue since it is a long and hollow cylinder that has cutting jaws on the end of it. While many of the common uses of these laparoscopic power morcellators involve gallbladder and spleen removal surgeries, there were also uses for other surgeries. As applicable here, these devices have been used in procedures such as a hysterectomy and surgery to remove uterine fibroids. The purpose was to shorten recovery times and make it a less difficult procedure.
Update- 1-4-2021- “A boxed warning and more explicit and detailed information about the risks associated with laparoscopic power morcellators should be included in labelling of the gynecologic surgery device, according to newly finalized guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). ..This final document updates an earlier 2014 guidance to recommend that manufacturers of laparoscopic power morcellators (LPMs) include more specificity about how the risk of the devices increases with the age of patients. Labels should now also give detailed information about the risk of spreading benign uterine tissue and make clear that LPMs should always be used with containment systems. (RELATED: Fears over device surveillance amid talk of deregulation, Regulatory Focus 20 June 2017)” RAPS
2-25-2020- “The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced several new steps designed to make the use of laparoscopic power morcellators (LPMs) safer in gynecologic surgeries. The agency granted marketing authorization for updated labeling for the PneumoLiner morcellation tissue containment system; released draft guidance recommending the addition of specific safety information to the product labeling for LPMs; and issued a Safety Communication recommending that an LPM only be used in certain gynecologic surgeries with a containment system that is compatible with the morcellator.” Medscape
What is a Laparoscopic Power Morcellator?
“Laparoscopic power morcellators are Class II medical devices used during laparoscopic (minimally invasive) surgeries to cut tissue into smaller pieces so the tissue can be removed through a small incision site (typically 2 cm long or less). These devices are commonly used in gallbladder, kidney, liver, and spleen removal surgery. They are also used in hysterectomy (surgical procedure to remove a women’s uterus) and myomectomy (surgical procedure to remove uterine fibroids which are noncancerous growths in the lining of a women’s uterus).” FDA “Laparoscopic surgeries are associated with shorter post-operative recovery time and a reduced risk of infection compared to hysterectomy or myomectomy done through an abdominal incision.” Id.
The side effects
Although there are side effects for gynecological surgeries, the device can have some positive effects for patients. There are several different companies that manufacture morcellators. The two largest makers of the product are Karl Storz GmbH and the Ethicon subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson. Ethicon ceased selling morcellators in 2014. There are several other manufacturers of the product who continue to sell it.
The use of this device for hysterectomies and myomectomies (surgery for uterine fibroids) has caused some severe complications for women who have received the procedure. The major difficulty is that it is difficult sometimes to distinguish between cancerous tissue and a uterine fibroid before the procedure. Given the similarity between the two, telling the difference may often be impossible until the actual tissue can be analyzed. This means that when doctors insert the power morcellator and use it to reduce tissue, they sometimes cannot tell what the actual risks are. If the tissue that is being ground for removal is cancerous, the procedure runs the risk of dispersing cancerous tissues outside of the affected area. In other words, the morcellator takes cancerous tissue, blasts it and disperses it to other places in the body where it takes root and grows into a dangerous and often fatal type of cancer.
The FDA’s Investigation
In the wake of reports of the possibility that laparoscopic power morcellators can increase risk of cancer, the FDA conducted an investigation. The FDA issued a safety communication in 2014 that detailed the risks associated with this procedure. The FDA estimates that between 1 in every 225 and 1 in every 580 women undergoing gynecological surgery may have undetected cancer, causing this risk. Among other things, the FDA required a new boxed warning and for treatment providers to consider other options before using a laparoscopic power morcellator. In the wake of this, Ethicon exited the market for this product. The FDA has sought to discourage the use of this product for several different types of procedures, including hysterectomies. The FDA also recommended several ways, including design and implementation, where this product could be made safer. Now, several companies manufacture morcellators with the use of a containment bag that is intended to prevent cancerous tissue from spreading around the body after it is reduced by the morcellator.
What is morcellation?
“Morcellation means cutting an object or tissue into smaller pieces for removal. When it comes to gynecology, it could mean cutting up the uterus, polyps, tumors, or fibroids so they can be removed through a smaller opening.” https://www.hystersisters.com/vb2/article_557161.htm
“Surgeons have several different options for morcellation tools. There are power tools, such as the specifically-designed morcellator, and then there are the manual tools like the scalpel. The decision mostly depends on the surgeon’s preference and your specific situation. Some tools have the ability not only to cut, but also to core and extract tissues. Morcellation can either be done in a closed environment, such as a bag, or in an open environment such as the uterus, pelvic cavity, or abdominal region.” Id.
Laparoscopic Power Morcellator Lawsuits
There are two different means that patients have for obtaining compensation for any harms that they may have suffered from laparoscopic power morcellators. The first is a suit against the manufacturer of the device for any defects in the product. This lawsuit could lead to a power morcellator lawsuit settlement. The second is a medical malpractice suit against the doctor, especially given that the doctor may not have been able to distinguish between a uterine fibroid and cancerous tissue.
Power Morcellator lawsuit settlements
“FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH)’s most recent assessment of using laparoscopic power morcellators (LPM) to treat presumed uterine fibroids confirms concerns outlined in our 2014 safety communication which discouraged the use of these products for that use. Women with unsuspected uterine sarcoma who undergo morcellation of presumed benign fibroids are at risk for mechanical spread of cancerous tissue and worsened clinical outcomes. As part of the FDA’s ongoing
efforts, CDRH conducted an updated review to assess:
- the prevalence of sarcoma in women undergoing myomectomy or hysterectomy for presumed benign uterine fibroids;
- clinical outcomes for patients who were diagnosed with cancer following morcellation (power or manual) during myomectomy or hysterectomy to treat presumed uterine fibroids; and,
- differences in patient outcomes for women who have undergone electric power morcellation compared to manual (e.g., scalpel) morcellation and/or no morcellation.
In addition, we reviewed Medical Device Reports (MDRs) received by FDA for dissemination of malignancy following LPM use as well as information related to changes in rates of hysterectomy or myomectomy procedures performed since our 2014 communication.” FDA
When surgeons had wanted to perform procedures on women through minimally invasive means, they had opted for a procedure that is called laparoscopic power morcellation. This was intended to achieve the same results as a surgery with an incision, while resulting in an easier recovery period. However, there have been unintended consequences that have accompanied the use of this procedure. In some instances, it has been alleged to have increased a woman’s risk of a cancer diagnosis in the wake of the procedure. This had led to Food and Drug Administration warnings about the safety of the product and procedure. There have been numerous lawsuits that have been brought against both the manufacturer of the product and the doctors who have performed the procedure. If you or someone in your family have undergone this procedure and have been diagnosed with cancer, you should contact a Laparoscopic Power Morcellation lawsuit attorney immediately. Many victims are wondering about power morcellator lawsuit settlements.
There have been many suits filed against the manufacturers of these morcellators. Some of these lawsuits have alleged that the manufacturers placed into commerce products that were defectively designed. State law product liability grounds have formed the basis for these suits. The plaintiffs have alleged that the manufacturers could have sold a product that was a safer alternative. In addition, the lawsuits allege that the manufacturers knew of the defects related to the product and failed to warn patients of the risks attached to the surgery. In fact, according to the plaintiffs, the manufacturers deliberately concealed the data that was in their possession that indicated that the morcellators caused an increased risk of cancer. Many victims are seeking information about power morcellator lawsuit settlements
Johnson and Johnson and Olympus Corp settlement
Johnson & Johnson has sought to settle the lawsuits that have been brought against it. In addition, Olympus Corp., another manufacturer of the product, has also settled many of the cases that have been brought against it. There are still hundreds of cases pending in front of courts, although none have gone to trial yet.In addition, there is also the possibility of filing a claim against the doctor who conducted the surgical procedure. This is arguably medical malpractice given that the cancerous tissue was undetected by the doctor prior to the procedure. If you can prove the doctor was negligent by proceeding to use a laparoscopic power morcellator when the patient had undetected cancer, then you can recovery under a malpractice theory as well. Of course, a doctor can always be joined to a product liability lawsuit as well since the doctor was part of the transaction chain that resulted in a defendant coming into contact with a defective product. It is not your responsibility to prove exactly who is liable, only that you received a defective product. It is for the court to decide exactly who bear the legal liability for that defective product.
- “In October 2015, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated several morcellator cases against J&J’s Ethicon unit in U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas before Senior District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil in MDL-2652. At the time the MDL was formed, other defendants included manufacturers Richard Wolf, Karl Storz and Gyrus. Since the majority of cases were against Ethicon, the other defendant lawsuits were not included in the MDL. Since many of the women involved in lawsuits were fighting aggressive uterine cancer, conducting their depositions before they could no longer testify was important. In January 2016, U.S. Magistrate Judge James P. O’Hara signed an order granting expedited discovery status for women whose health was quickly deteriorating. Attorneys were then able to schedule and conduct depositions more quickly. In May 2016, defendants and plaintiffs filed a joint motion to dissolve the MDL, and in June Judge Vratil ordered the MDL dissolved after only eight months. According to the parties, most of the cases were resolved.” Drugwatch
- “Due to the joint efforts of the Parties and the Court, the Parties have successfully resolved the vast majority of cases filed in the MDL,” the joint motion said. “All remaining actions have been resolved and/or dismissed.” At the time of dismissal, there were only two cases left in the MDL against Ethicon. These cases went back to the federal courts in the jurisdictions where they were originally filed. Any lawsuits filed in the future will be handled individually in local district courts unless another consolidation occurs.” Id.
Diagnosed with cancer after your procedure
It is vital that you contact a Laparoscopic Power Morcellation lawsuit lawyer as soon as possible if you have undergone a procedure using a laparoscopic power morcellator to gain a full understanding of your legal rights. Your morcellator lawyer can inform you of your prospects of a Power Morcellator lawsuit settlement if you have been diagnosed with cancer after your procedure. It is also critically important that you are screened for uterine cancer given the complications that have been experienced. A Morcellation lawsuit is a serious matter and you need to retain the best Laparoscopic Power Morcellation lawsuit lawyer. A morcellator lawsuit is not easy to litigate by any means so you need to retain a power morcellator lawsuit attorney.